Delhi High Court directed Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) to re-consider the high-pitched assessment as gross profit applied is 12.5% as against historical gross profit of 1.06%. Coercive measures against the petitioner instructed to be kept on hold.
Megicon Impex Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi West & Ors. (Delhi High Court) he learned Counsel appearing for the parties have drawn attention to a notification dated 05.07.2022, whereby the period commencing from 01.03.2020 to 28.02.2022, was directed to be excluded for computing the period of limitation, for filing […]
Colour Cottex Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court find merit in Revenues contentions that the relief directing adjustment of duty drawback against the petitioner’s obligation to make a pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act is not permissible. The nature of a claim for duty drawback is […]
Sanjay Sudan Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that deductee/ assessee cannot be called upon to pay tax, which is already deducted from his income as TDS. TDS not deposited by deductor cannot be set-off against refund amount payable to deductee. Facts- The petitioner was an employee of Kingfisher. The employer had […]
Delhi High Court held that recourse to provisions of section 263 of the Income Tax Act sustained as prima facie view concludes that AO has committed an error in law.
Delhi High Court held that in absence of any profit motive in the activity of assessee-society and also profit so generated is ploughed back for charitable activities. Exemption benefit under section 11 duly available.
Delhi High Court held granted bail, in fraudulent claim of ITC under GST, as bail already granted to co-accused and petitioner had no prior criminal antecedents.
Delhi High Court held that in terms of rule 24 of the ITAT Rules, when the Tribunal has ex-parte disposed of the appeal on merits and thereafter the appellant appears, the Tribunal shall set aside the ex-parte order and restore the appeal if sufficient cause is shown.
HC found no infirmity with decision of Adjudicating Authority and its findings that certain parties were involved in illegal export of Red Sandalwood/Red Sanders
Delhi High Court held that section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 empower Government to make amendments with retrospective effect.
