Follow Us:

Delhi High Court

Comparable with functional and risk profiles difference cannot be selected

September 27, 2018 2988 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) The revenue urged that a stringent application of the comparability test was unnecessary as was also provisioned in Chapter-6 of United Nations Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing, Edition 2013, and some flexibility in conducting this comparison was urged to be allowed. However, from […]

Delhi VAT: Interest allowable on Pre-Deposit Refund paid for filing Appeal

September 24, 2018 3255 Views 0 comment Print

MRF Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes (Delhi High Court) Pre-deposit sums which the assessee is compelled to pay to seek recourse to an appellate remedy, do not necessarily bear the stamp or character of tax, especially when it succeeds on the particular plea. That being the case, the insistence upon a procedural step, i.e. filing of a form […]

NICAF files writ in Delhi HC against non extension of Tax Audit / ITR due date

September 24, 2018 17781 Views 4 comments Print

Northern India CA Federation Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes (Delhi High Court) Northern India CA Federation has filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court against non-extension of Tax Audit Report and the relevant Income Tax Return filing due date for Financial Year 2017-18 (i.e. A.Y. 2018-19). FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER […]

Clubbing of Advance authorisations when not possible: HC explains

September 20, 2018 1812 Views 0 comment Print

Jindal Poly Film Ltd Vs Designated Authority & Anr. (Delhi High Court) In a case involving clubbing of Advance Authorisations issued in 2004 and 2010, Delhi High Court has held that clubbing can be provided only if export obligation period of authorization issued at a prior point of time allowed under Paragraph 4.22 of the […]

Stay order need to be reasoned order and should not be a mere direction to pay

September 20, 2018 3699 Views 0 comment Print

LG Electronics India Private Limited Vs PCIT (Delhi High Court) Mr. Deepak Chopra, learned counsel for the Petitioner, has produced before this Court a copy of OM dated 31st July, 2017 which modifies the earlier OM, dated 29th February, 2016, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’), stating that standard rate for grant of stay […]

Reassessment Valid if There Is Tangible Material For Reopening

September 15, 2018 1140 Views 0 comment Print

The Delhi High Court held that the entire premise of the reassessment notices in this case is that the nondisclosure of the taxing event, i.e. allotment of shares (and the absence of any declaration as to value) deprived the AO of the opportunity to look into the records.

Service Tax Payment before issue of SCN not a bar to Impose Penalty

September 12, 2018 6888 Views 0 comment Print

N & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner, Goods & Service Tax & Central Excise (Delhi High Court) The facts of this case, in the opinion of this court, notes that the assessee was aware about its service tax liability; despite this knowledge, it filed its returns claiming that no liabilities were attracted. […]

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) not attracted for a mere wrong claim

September 12, 2018 21642 Views 1 comment Print

Pr. CIT Vs Samtel India LTD (Delhi High Court) From the facts of this case it is clear that the assessee disclosed all the particulars of his income. The AO has disallowed his claim without holding it to be bogus or false. Hence, the genuineness of the loss occurred is not at question here. The […]

Income Tax dept can reassess Income of Sonia and Rahul Gandhi: Delhi HC

September 11, 2018 3069 Views 0 comment Print

Sonia Gandhi & Oscar Fernandes Vs. ACIT and Rahul Gandhi Vs. PCIT (Delhi High Court) The entire premise of the reassessment notices in this case is that the non­disclosure of the taxing event, i.e. allotment of shares (and the absence of any declaration as to value) deprived the AO of the opportunity to look into […]

Section 138 Attracted Even If Cheque Issued For Sale Consideration Not Disclosed in Sale Deed

September 2, 2018 18615 Views 1 comment Print

Bhawish Chand Sharma Vs Bawa Singh (Delhi High Court) The mutual agreement between the parties to disclose only a part of the consideration under the sale deed may attract other consequences for the parties. However, that by itself does not render the underlying transaction unlawful. Pertinently, it is not claimed that at the relevant time, […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031