Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CESTAT Mumbai

Cenvat credit not to be reversed on waste or by-product generation during manufacturing

October 17, 2018 4056 Views 0 comment Print

If any input is contained in waste by-product or goods the cenvat credit shall not be denied. If rule 6(3) is made applicable in these goods this clarification will stand redundant.

Commissioner (Appeals) by deciding the case of merits did not exceed its jurisdiction

October 12, 2018 1782 Views 0 comment Print

Hindustan Aegis LPG Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) In Hindustan Aegis LPG Limited v. Commissioner of Excise, Mumbai-II [APPEAL No. E/51/2008 dated October 12, 2018], Hindustan Aegis LPG Limited (Appellant) had filed a refund claim of Modified Value Added Tax (MODVAT) which was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner In Order-In Original (OIO) on […]

GST on amount received by Co-op Housing Society from its members

October 12, 2018 6267 Views 0 comment Print

The principle of mutuality is based on common law principles. It rests on the theory that a person cannot make a profit from himself/herself. An amount received from oneself cannot be regarded as income so as to be liable to tax. However, litigation often arises on its application to facts of cases.

Companies can avail Cenvat Credit on CSR Expenses

August 31, 2018 5103 Views 0 comment Print

Essel Propack Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST, Bhiwandi (CESTAT Mumbai) To pin point the dispute, it is now to be looked into as to if CSR can be considered as input service and be included within the  definition of “activities relating to business” and if in so doing, a company’s image before corporate world is […]

No Service Tax on Surrender Charges on ULIP

July 14, 2018 1695 Views 0 comment Print

We are of the view that the ULIP surrender charges are not part of taxable service of management of funds. Rather it is in the nature of penalty or liquidated damages which is not a service and hence cannot be made liable for tax during the period involved .

Cenvat Credit eligible on CA Service for preparation of review petition before anti-dumping authorities

July 9, 2018 639 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai) In this case, the U.S. Department of Commerce and European Commission issued notices to the assessee for levying anti-dumping duty on the goods exported by it. For the purpose of effective participation before the anti-dumping authorities, the appellant had […]

Renting of Immovable Property: Service tax not Leviable on One-Time Non-Refundable Deposit

June 23, 2018 1704 Views 0 comment Print

Kagal Nagar Parishad Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) Revenue sought to tax the one time premium deposit, which is not refundable under the head of renting of immovable property service considering the same as rent. We find that there is a separate charge for the rent, which alone is taxable, the onetime premium […]

Penalty & confiscation of Gun merely for import by a non-renowned shooter is irregular

June 15, 2018 6981 Views 0 comment Print

Confiscation of freely importable air gun of 0.177 by shooter on the ground that he was not a renowned shooter is irregular as the same is not in conformity with rules prescribed for such imports.

No Service Tax on training and coaching in various foreign languages

June 8, 2018 3945 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Consistent Software Technologies (I) Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai) In the present case the respondent is engaged in imparting the training and coaching in various foreign languages i.e. French, German, Japanese, Spanish etc. which they claimed as a vocational training and covered under Notification No.9/2003-ST and 24/2004-ST. The very identical issue […]

Renting of Truck not amounts to Supply of Tangible Goods Service

May 31, 2018 12198 Views 0 comment Print

Revenue has demanded the Service Tax on the renting of trucks under the head of Supply of Tangible Goods Service. As per the facts of the case which is not in dispute, we note that the appellant have given the trucks to the lessees on monthly rental charges. The appellant did not provide any facility such as driver, repair and maintenance, fuel etc. Once the truck is rented out the entire possession and control is of the lessees and during the renting period there is no interference of the appellant.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728