CESTAT Mumbai upholds the rejection of a service tax refund claim by RJB Estate Pvt. Ltd. Find out why the claim was denied and the legal reasoning behind it
CESTAT Mumbai held that Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR, 2004) can only be made applicable against the manufacturer/service provider or the person who availed the allegedly inadmissible credit and accordingly recovery of CENVAT Credit against Input Service Distributor unsustainable.
CESTAT Mumbai held that once the duty on final products has been accepted by the department, CENVAT credit availed need not be reversed even if the activity docs not amount to manufacture.
CESTAT Mumbai held that Cenvat credit can be availed for clearance of dyed yarn, if the duty is paid at the doubling stage.
Analyze CESTAT Mumbai’s ruling in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, focusing on ‘unjust enrichment’ and CA certificate’s role in excise duty cases.
Analyze the CESTAT Mumbai order in S K Universal Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs, highlighting the determination of ‘cut and polished diamonds’ value and its consistency with Customs Valuation Rules.
CESTAT Mumbai held that duty liability in terms of Chewing tobacco & Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010 unsustainable merely alleging that sealed/uninstalled packing machine is available in the factory premises.
Analyzing the S R Traders vs. Commissioner of Customs case under Customs Act Section 28, including undervaluation and compliance issues with cosmetics imports.
In a recent CESTAT Mumbai order, the eligibility of cenvat credit for bus transportation charges is discussed. Learn the key details and implications here.
An in-depth look at the CESTAT Mumbai ruling in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax-VI Vs Group M Media (I) Pvt. Ltd. concerning service tax on media volume discounts.
