Held that revenue needs to establish that the goods lying or found in the shop/ godwon of the assessee are not duty paid.
Commissioner of Central Excise And Customs, Central Goods And Service Tax Vs Shree Cement Ltd (CESTAT Delhi) Held that cenvat credit of 2% CVD paid under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus dated 17/03/2012 is eligible to the appellant. Facts- The issue involved in these Appeals is whether Cenvat credit of 2% CVD paid on import of steam […]
Held that deliberate concealment relating to mis-declaration of the goods and overvaluing with the intention to avail higher duty drawback is untenable
Held that the allegation of clandestine production and removal has to be established against any person by independent and tangible evidence. No demand exists in absence of such evidence.
Agrawal Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) It is undisputed that the appellant has been manufacturing goods on job work basis and has been clearing them without paying duty as per the Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 25.03.1986. If the activity amounted to manufacture- which has not been […]
CESTAT held that service tax cannot be levied on the company for payment of rent to the director unless such premises are used for commercial purpose.
K K Spun India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Counsel for the appellant urges that the show cause notice is mis-conceived, as the finished products manufactured by the appellant are not exempted, rather are dutiable @ 10% ad valorem as per CTH 68109990 under the Central Excise […]
G & G Ispat (P) Limited Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) Appellant admittedly has paid the service tax chargeable from them under reverse charge mechanism, on 31.10.2015, which was reflected in the return filed for the period 2014-15, which was filed on 21.01.2016. Further, appellant has also informed this fact of tax having been deposited vide […]
Leather Sellers Vs Commissioner of Customs And Excise, Patparganj (CESTAT Delhi) The brief facts are that the appellant is a manufacturer-exporter of leather goods. They had re-imported a consignment of goods, which were earlier exported for the purpose of repair etc. and thereafter, reexport. For such re-import, the appellant had filed Bill of Entry dated […]
Sanjeev Jindal Vs Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) The finding recorded in the order is that exemption under a notification that granted area based exemption was wrongly obtained by the Company and its Directors. It is for this reason that apart from denying the exemption claimed by the Company, penalty was also imposed […]
