NIIT Limited Vs Commissioner, CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Transitional provision of Section 142(3) of CGST Act provides that every claim of refund filed by the person after the appointed day (30.06.2017) for refund of any amount of Cenvat credit/duty/tax/interest or any other amount paid under the existing law shall be disposed of in accordance with the […]
National Fertilizers Limited Vs Commissioner CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) It is not possible to accept the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant. It is not in dispute that the issues that arose in all the three appeals were identical. It is true that the Department had filed one appeal only […]
CESTAT Delhi held that supply of ISO Tankers on lease/rental basis by foreign suppliers to the appellant would amount to a deemed sale and accordingly reverse charge not applicable on the same under ‘supply of tangible goods for use’.
The main grievance of the appellant, which is an Association of Indian Steel producer in India, is that despite the recommendation made by the designated authority in the final finding pursuant to the sunset review investigation that was initiated for imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of colour coated/pre-painted flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel originated in or exported from China PR and European Union , the Central Government did not issue a notification for imposition of anti-dumping duty though three months expired from the date of publication of final finding.
Gabriel India Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) w.e.f. 01.07.2017, the Government of India had introduced GST regime which has replaced earlier Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 with transitional period of 30 days. Accordingly, after 30.07.2017, no assessee is permitted to avail credit in the cenvat credit account. As […]
B.L. Goel & Company Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) The brief facts are that the appellant is engaged in running Works Contract Services and services of construction of residential complexes during the period 2013-14 till 2017-2018 (June 2017). Show cause notice dated 23.04.2019 was issued demanding service […]
CESTAT Delhi held that period of limitation should be calculated from the date when the order was served and not from the date when order was dispatched.
Divya Yog Man Dir Trust Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) The demand under this head was made only against the appellant Divya Yog Mandir Trust on the amount received by it from M/s. Rajashri Media Pvt. Ltd. for grant of exclusive rights to all audio, visual, audio-visual and text materials of Divya Yog […]
Chhaya Mahalley Vs Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) The issue as to was whether coal transported from pitheads of the mines to the railway sidings would fall within the taxable service defined under section 65 (105) (zzzy) of the Finance Act was examined by the Supreme Court in Singh Transporters. The Supreme […]
Read about the CESTAT decision in the case of Globus Infocomm Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import), where the plea for change of classification was accepted. The order directs the re-examination of classification, duty demands, mis-declaration allegations, and penalties.
