CESTAT Chennai rules: Redemption fine and penalty can be imposed on re-export of prohibited goods. Detailed analysis of the Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd case.
Understand the implications of amending a Bill of Entry under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962. Detailed analysis of Valeo India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs case and its impact.
CESTAT Chennai quashes Rs. 25,000 penalty on Gayrams Shipping Services due to absence of mens rea. Detailed analysis of the case and legal implications.
Read the detailed analysis of Rattha Holding Company Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai). CESTAT ruling clarifies no service tax on properties rented out for accommodation and related activities.
Understand the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs Commissioner regarding shampoo sachet assessable value under Central Excise Act.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order on the classification of Sweet Pearl P200 containing 99% Maltitol Crystals. Analysis, conclusion, and consequential benefits discussed.
In the case of Gencor Pacific Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Chennai allows re-credit of customs duty in advance authorisation scrips.
Royalty and other charges are not includible in assessable value if Payment of royalty and other charges not for imported goods and not a condition of sale of goods
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Chennai order regarding mis-declaration of goods, penalty under Customs Act 1962, and setting aside of penalties and fines.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside order rejecting customs refund for Doowon Electronics, citing lack of proper communication and natural justice violations.
