Discover how CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of Commscope Solution (India) Pvt. Ltd., granting customs duty exemption based on the minimum operating voltage of patch cords.
CESTAT Chennai grants relief to ESSA Exports by deeming seized goods as ‘scrap.’ Detailed analysis of the order, including the examination of goods and expert opinions.
CESTAT Chennai held that a decision on classification cannot be made merely because the goods are mentioned as ‘Food Supplement’ by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Since ingredient of product clearly shows that they have oils of fish, the product is rightly classifiable under CTH 1504 20 20.
Commissioner of Customs vs Gamesa Wind Turbine – CESTAT Chennai rules flanges integral to Wind Operated Electric Generators, qualifying for excise duty exemption.
Explore the implications of the Priyanka Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Customs case as per the detailed CESTAT Chennai order dated 25.01.2024.
CESTAT Chennai held that the advertising materials like glow sign boards, flex printing, broachers, stickers, tags, posters, hand bills, signages, etc., which cater to the requirements of the specific customers, on which VAT is paid, is not leviable to Service Tax.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order favoring Acer India’s video projectors’ classification, granting customs exemption. Analysis and details provided.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that the assessee is entitled to cenvat credit of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on the services received from Foreign Service provider prior to 18.04.2006.
CESTAT Chennai held that DGCEI officers are Central Excise Officers as they have been vested with the powers are fully competent to issue Show Cause Notice demanding service tax on reverse charge.
Huge loss as Kiwi fruit re-export order delayed; CESTAT Chennai reduces redemption fine in Ram Prasath vs Commissioner of Customs case. Full text of CESTAT Chennai order.
