Read about CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling confirming separate classification for software licenses and software, allowing the benefit of nil customs duty rate.
Learn from CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling that a duty-free shop licensee must pay customs duty when violating Customs Act provisions. Analysis & implications explained.
CESTAT Bangalore rules reimbursable expenses not includable in taxable value for services under warranty, setting precedent for service tax assessments.
CESTAT Bangalore sets aside differential duty in Hazel Mercantile Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs case, emphasizing no demand on undervaluation due to higher discount on import.
CESTAT Bangalore nullifies Rs. 1,00,000 penalty on B.K. Manjunath under Customs Act Section 114(1) due to lack of evidence in illegal export allegation.
CESTAT Bangalore clarifies that the ‘Let Export Order’ date is crucial for determining the customs duty rate on exports, impacting refund claims.
CESTAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minebea Intec, waiving customs penalty post voluntary duty payment before SCN issuance. Detailed insights here.
CESTAT Bangalore rules against UDL Logistics for not verifying exporter’s rep, imposing penalty. Full analysis of the case provided.
CESTAT Bangalore rules that Huy Glass made of 100% glass fibres is correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 8421 as air purifiers, not textiles.
CESTAT Bangalore rules on Bra Cups classification: Customs duty to be charged on the value of a pair. Detailed analysis of Lovable Lingerie Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs.
