CESTAT Bangalore directs re-adjudication rejecting appeals on classification of imported insoluble sulphur. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
CESTAT Bangalore rules on Mineral Enterprises Ltd. case, emphasizing no extended limitation for de-bonding burnt goods amid riots. Detailed analysis inside.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
CESTAT Bangalore quashes violation allegations against Ajay Overseas Shipping, emphasizing brokers’ duty to advise clients on law compliance. Full order review.
In the case of Vidya Herbs Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, the CESTAT Bangalore ruled on the denial of benefits for coffee beans import under a notification. Get the full analysis here.
Bharti Airtel’s appeal for customs duty exemption on Battery Fuse Units dismissed by CESTAT Bangalore. Learn about the classification dispute and its implications.
Explore the CESTAT Bangalore’s decision on the classification of imported “Student interactive respond system,” as it delves into the applicability of Customs Tariff Chapter Note 5(E) and the implications for classification under CTH 8543.
CESTAT Bangalore overturns license revocation of Global Agencies, citing violation of rule 11(a) of CBLR and emphasizing due process.
Royalty paid for technology use in production is on net value of goods made in India; thus, it can’t be added to the value of finished goods imported for trading.
Madras High Court remanded Carl Zeiss India’s case for converting shipping bills under a drawback scheme to an advance authorization scheme. The Court found the time limit in a Board Circular unsustainable and directed authorities to consider the company’s documents for conversion eligibility.
