Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CESTAT Allahabad

Denial of CENVAT Credit on supplementary invoices prior to 01.04.2011 unjustified

September 5, 2023 435 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that denial of CENVAT Credit on supplementary invoices evidencing the payment of service tax for period prior to amendments made in CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 by way of insertion of Rule 9 (1) (bb) effective from 01.04.2011 is unjustified.

Mere technicalities shouldn’t thwart right to a fair hearing: CESTAT Allahabad

August 30, 2023 252 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad revisits delay in appeal by E L Sewedy Electrometer due to the Director’s absence abroad. Focus on re-adjudication and merits.

Tribunal doesn’t have jurisdiction to prescribe rate of interest for refund

August 26, 2023 462 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that tribunal has no jurisdiction to prescribe the rate of interest which is prescribed by the Government of India in terms of Notification issue under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Delay in filing appeal beyond extended period of 30 days not condonable

August 25, 2023 4779 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that any delay in filing of an appeal beyond the extended period of thirty days after expiry of normal period of sixty days, cannot be condoned

Rule 20 of CESTAT Rules permits Tribunal to dismiss appeal on non-appearance of assessee

August 18, 2023 963 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that in terms of rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 in case appellant doesn’t appeal when the appeal is called on for hearing, the Tribunal may, dismiss the appeal for default.

CENVAT Credit of materials used in manufacture of capital goods is duly available

July 24, 2023 318 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that CENVAT Credit of materials used for fabrication work of machines which are capital goods is duly available in terms of rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Service Tax not payable on refundable security deposits from customers

December 1, 2022 1386 Views 0 comment Print

ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Central GST (CESTAT Allahabad) The issue relates to inclusion of the amount collected by the appellant as Interest Free Maintenance Security (IFMS). Revenue’s contention is that the said collected amount would fall under the category of ‘Management Maintenance and Repair Services’ and would be liable to service tax separately. […]

Charges of clandestine removal needs to be substantiated by evidence

October 20, 2022 1254 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Allahabad held that clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence. Here, as department has not adduced any additional evidence to substantiate the allegation of clandestine removal not sustained.

Explanation widening scope of provision will have prospective effect

September 27, 2022 843 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT held that ‘Explanation’ added to definition of ‘exempted service’ would widen the scope of the provision and will have prospective effect and cannot be applied retrospectively.

No Unjust Enrichment when Service Tax Refund Claim was Time Barred

September 22, 2022 1290 Views 0 comment Print

Krishna Construction Co. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax (CESTAT Allahabad) In the instance case service tax was liable to be paid at the relevant time and it is only subsequently that by a retrospective amendment, exemption was granted with a specific condition that refund could be claimed by filing it within six […]

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031