Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pintu Tyagi Vs Commissioner of Central Excise &
Related Assessment Year : 19/10/2023
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pintu Tyagi Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Allahabad)

Conclusion: Penalty under Rule 26 was justified on the proof that there were sufficient evidences adduced to allege clandestine removal and appellant had in his statement recorded under section 14 while giving the details of working of the unit had admitted that he was actively involved in the working of the unit.

Held: Intelligence was received that appellant (Paresh Tyagi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31