PCIT Vs Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Calcutta High Court) The short issue which falls for consideration is whether the exercise of jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax-14 (Kolkata) (CIT) under Section 263 of the Act was just and proper. The Tribunal considered the factual position and noted that the CIT was of the opinion […]
PCIT Vs Apeejay Shipping Ltd. (Calcutta High Court) The Tribunal rightly held that the period of limitation for the assessment year 2007-08 has to be reckoned from the date of the order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) read with Section 263 i.e. 8th December, 2011 and not from the date of the […]
Maa Durga Plastic Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Constitutional validity of Section 140(5) of the CGST Act to the extent that it denies ITC on capital goods in transit challenged before Hon’ble Calcutta High Court Maa Durga Plastic has filed a writ petition vide W.P.A. No. 10340 of 2021 before the Hon’ble Calcutta High […]
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Tribunal, erred in law in upholding the order of the CIT (Appeals) by deleting the addition of Rs.11,39,00,000/-made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 by disregarding that the assessee could not satisfactorily explain the genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness of the share applicants in question ?
Transway Wine Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Calcutta High Court) Impugned notice is quashed solely on the ground that the impugned notice was issued in the name of non-existing company in spite of revenue having notice and knowledge of non-existence of such Company. Quashing of this notice will not prevent the respondents from issuing fresh notice in […]
The allotment of a plot by the West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (HIDCO) to former cricketer and current BCCI President Sourav Ganguly for the purpose of establishing an educational institution was quashed as no one could claim to be exclusive, above the law and sought benefits from the State, especially when question arose for allotment of plots for commercial ventures.
Neeraja Rateria Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre Delhi (Calcutta High Court) The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. In this matter the petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order dated 26th August, 2021 passed under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act relating to assessment year 2018-19 and subsequent […]
The Calcutta High court in this case was considering the writ petition where the petitioner contended that the assessment was made in disregard of the violation of natural justice as the password for the Video Conferencing was not provided and relevant evidence was produced.
Bajrang Tea Manufacturing Company Private Limited Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) I am of the view that a very short issue, according to me, involved in these writ petition is as to whether before passing the aforesaid impugned assessment orders, the objections/representations made by the petitioners against the initiation of impugned proceedings under […]
Temporarily petitioner was not carrying his business from the premises in question from officially registered premises and they were carrying business in question from home.
