Calcutta High Court held that conjoint reading of section 18(1)(c) and section 18(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 definitely propagate that the duty to get the sale proceeds of export to be repatriated expiry with the statutory period of six months.
Commissioner of CGST And Central Excise Vs Ashirwad Foundries Private Limited And Anr (Calcutta High Court) Whether central excise can move against legal heirs of a deceased person to recover the penalty imposed under Act. The Division bench of Calcutta High Court in this case was dealing with an important matter where the Department filed […]
Calcutta HC order in on how an order should not be drafted where Tribunal adopted finding of CIT(A) verbatim as its own findings
Kamal Nath Vs PCIT (Calcutta High Court) What are the grounds on which transfer of assessment records/jurisdiction can be challenged u/s 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961? In this high profile case relating to ex-chief minister of Madhya Pradesh, when Dr A M Singhvi along with Mr JP Khaitan represented the petitioner before Hon’ble Justice […]
Calcutta High Court held that passing of an order without allowing the assessee an opportunity of cross-examination of the concerned person is against the principle of natural justice and liable to be set aside.
Rifle Factory Co-operative Society Ltd Vs ACIT (Calcutta High Court) Whether demand in pursuance of order of assessment can be pursued without disposing off the petition for stay of demand. The Single Bench of Calcutta High Court in this case was dealing with a situation where without disposing off the petition for stay of demand, […]
Whether ITAT has the power to entertain additional ground without recording reasons and without following Rule 46A of the Income-tax rules, 1962 and whether jurisdictional issue relating to non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) can be raised at any time?
HC held that we are confident that very same officer will have an open mind and issue a show cause notice in a proper manner giving adequate opportunity to the appellants to submit their reply and it is thereafter the show cause notice has to be adjudicated
It is not a case of lack of enquiry or lack of proper enquiry. The PCIT does not in as many words states that there was lack of enquiry or lack of proper enquiry and all that is said is that the assessing officer did not verify these aspects which is factually incorrect. Therefore, it is not a case where the PCIT could have invoked his jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act.
Mobile Store Limited Vs Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Calcutta High Court) 1. This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 29th November, 2022 in W.P.A. 23900 of 2022. The said writ petition was filed by the appellant praying for a direction upon the respondents to refund the amount of excess […]
