PCIT Vs Dempo Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal was admitted on 18th October 2016 on the following substantial questions of law: A. Whether the Hon’ble ITAT was right in completely ignoring the decision of the Hon’ble ITAT, Kolkata in ACIT V/s. Bharati Cellular Ltd.(105) […]
Premprakash laxminarayan bansal Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) 1. Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 0178/2021 registered with APMC Police Station, Navi Mumbai for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail. 2. The subject crime was registered at the […]
Mansi Ankit Bhalaria Vs Union of India And Ors. (Bombay High Court) A NUMBER OF WRITS FILED IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT AGAINST NOTICES UNDER SECTION 148 AND VIRES OF TAXATION AND OTHER LAWS ACT 2020 ALSO CHALLENGED, STAY GRANTED According to petitioners, the extension of time limit granted under The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation […]
HC directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider the prayers of provisional release of seized goods of the assessee, during the pendency of the proceedings under the Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Bombay High Court orders Union and State Governments to complete XIth standard admission based on Xth standard marks within six weeks. Full judgment included.
Bombay High Court declares notice issued by DCIT to non-existent entity Alok Knit Exports as invalid. Details of the judgment on Assessment Year 2012-2013.
The mere fact that the order of the appellate authority is not ‘acceptable’, which itself is an objectionable phrase, can be no ground for not allowing the claim unless the decision of the appellate authority has been suspended by a competent Court. Supreme Court emphasized that if such healthy rule of judicial discipline is not followed, it would result in undue harassment to the asssessees and chaos in the administration of tax laws.
Piramal Enterprises Limited Vs Additional/joint/Deputy/Assistant CIT/ITO National e-Assessment Centre (Bombay High Court) The HC declared that assessment for AY 2017-18 made u/s 143(3) vide order dated 22.4.2021 was non est u/s 144B(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for not adhering the procedure laid down u/s 144B(1) and u/s 144B(7/(vii) of the Act and holding […]
Sahil International Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) 1. Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that despite enforcement of the amended Income Tax Act, 1961 with effect from 01.04.2021, the Respondents purport to invoke repealed provisions of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act without following provisions of amended Act, issuing notice dated 07.06.2021. […]
Tata Communications Transformation Services Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) 1. Mr. Jehangir Mistri, learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioner vehemently contends that the impugned notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in the present matter issued on 21/05/2021 is absolutely untenable on various grounds. He submits several provisions of the Income Tax […]
