Ashtnidhi Developers Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Bombay High Court) If NFAC is a party respondent, the cause title will state NFAC c/o. concerned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and that Principal Commissioner of Income Tax shall accept service on behalf of NFAC. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT 1] Ms […]
This court, in the case of Heritage Lifestyles and Developers and Private Limited, a perusal of the said judgment indicates that the petitioner in that case was allowed to make such claim if the petitioner was otherwise eligible for credit of the amount. Considering those facts, this Court in the said judgment directed the respondents to accept the TRAN-1 filed by the petitioner and to give the due of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger/input tax credit of the petitioner within two weeks from the date of the order.
BOMBAY HIGH COURT has refused ad-interim relief to stall the proposed Initial Public Offering (IPO) by the country’s oldest and largest insurer –Life Insurance Corporation of India, with a rider that any IPO before the court finally decides the challenge would be subject to the outcome of the petition.
Commissioner of Customs II JNPT Vs Axiom Cordages Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Impugned order of CESTAT and the appeal memo clearly indicates that the main controversy which arises for determination is in the nature of classification dispute, which relates directly and proximately to the rate of duty applicable for the purpose of assessment and therefore the […]
Maniar Associates LLP Vs Vijay Niwas Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & Ors. (Bombay High Court) he fact remains that as respondent no.3 is in possession of the tenement in question and would now be handing over possession of such tenement to the petitioner/society. Hence considering the consistent view taken by this Court in Heritage Lifestyles and […]
Voltas Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) Facts- Petitioner is a company engaged in the business of air conditioning and refrigeration etc. During the A.Y. 2015-16, petitioner incurred expenses of Rs.3,30,82,713 towards CSR as per section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. Petitioner had also claimed deduction in return of income u/s 35AC and 80G […]
Concrete Additives and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs S N Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Mr. Menon’s contention that the tax invoices have been accepted by the respondent and therefore it is required to be presumed that there is an arbitration agreement between the parties also cannot be accepted. The acceptance of the tax […]
J M Financial and Investment Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) HC held that since four years had expired from the end of the relevant assessment year, as provided under Section 151(1) of the Act, it is only the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner who could […]
Raimaladitya Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Bombay High C0urt) The allegations in the reasons recorded are that as per information summary available to Revenue there is company by the name Raimaladitya Textile Pvt. Ltd., from whom bogus loan has been taken in F.Y. 2012-13 in the sum of Rs.40,88,06,800/- and the said Raimaladitya Textile Ltd., […]
Satara District Bar Association Satara Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) There is certainly an element of confidentiality in the notings by Judges of any Committee of this Court. There is also very good reason why such notings should not in fact ever be disclosed or allowed to be disclosed. Whether or not this […]
