Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nayan Jayantilal Balu Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Nayan Jayantilal Balu Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)

Perusal of the complaint launched against Petitioner also disclose allegations that Petitioner failed to substantiate the claim of purchases amounting to Rs. 2,74,03,016/- and the assessing officer held the purchases to be bogus and made an addition of Rs. 34,25,377/­(12.5% of the bogus purchases). On Appeal by Petitioner, CIT (A) vide order dated 19.12.2016 confirmed the addition. ITAT also confirmed said order. It is stated that, therefore, Petitioner has willfu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. DEEPAK SONI says:

    THE ASSESSEE HAS COMMITTED A BLUNDER BY APPROACHING THE HONOURABLE HIGH UNDER THE WRIT JURISDICTION. THE ADVOCATE OF THE ASSESSEE APPEARS TO HAVE MISGUIDED THE ASSESSEE FOR THE FEES AND PERHAPS OVERCONFIDENCE.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031