In re Ashokkumar Khimjibhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01, they have not paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST […]
In re Abdulwahid Shamsudin Malik (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01, they have not paid the fees of 10,000/- as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 […]
In re Ananta Synthetic Innovations (GST AAR Gujarat) The classification of the product manufactured and supplied by the applicant M/s. Ananta Synthetic Innovations, Survey No.345, Ananda Viramgam Medaadraj road, Manipur, Kadi, Mehsana-382728 (as per the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975(51 of 1975)) as well as the corresponding rate of GST (as per […]
Whether the supply of Occupational Health Check-up service (OHC) by the hospital i.e. nursing staff, Doctors, Paramedical staff on hospital’s payroll working in different corporate for providing health check-up service, ambulance facility, and allied medical services to their employees and also the camps conducted for health check-up outside the hospitals, to be treated as Health Care service and hence not taxable under CGST/SGST?
In re M/s. Wiptech Peripheral pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Applicant has neither filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 nor paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, […]
In re Maharaja Pratapsinh Coronation Gymkhana (GST AAR Gujarat) Application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-0 1, they have not paid the required fees of 10,000/- as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 for not paying […]
In re Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) (GST AAR Gujarat) In the present case the applicant is recipient of the services and not supplier of such services. Accordingly, the application is not liable for admission and therefore rejected without going in to the merits of the case. Instant application filed by M/s. Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), […]
In re Micro Instruments (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The MAAAR rejected the Miscellaneous Application dated 25.09.2020 filed by the Applicant i.e. M/s. Micro Instrument, to restore their Application dated 21.08.2019 seeking Rectification of Mistake in the MAAAR Order No. MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/26/2018-19 dated 22.03.2019, as the same had already been decided by the erstwhile Appellate Authority vide Order […]
In re Tirumala Milk Products Pvt Ltd. (GST AAAR Karnataka) in the instant appeal, the Appellant is aggrieved by the grounds on which the lower Authority has refused to admit the application for advance ruling which is that, the question on which the ruling was sought is a matter that is being investigated by the […]
In re Thirumalai Chemicals Limited (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) Q. The value to be adopted in respect of transfer to branches located outside the state? Ans: The applicant can adopt any one of the following three methods provided under Rule 28 of the CGST/ TNGST Rules 2017 read with Section 15 of the CGST/TNGST Act […]
