Read about Ansari Construction vs Additional Commissioner GST case. Unnecessary harassment, incorrect show cause notice, and arbitrary decisions highlighted. Full court order
R. J. Exim And Another Vs Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax (Allahabad High Court) From the perusal of Section 74(5) of the Act, it is evident that a person chargeable with tax may, before service of notice under sub-section (1), pay the amount of tax and interest under Section 50 and penalty @ […]
R. J. Exim And Another Vs Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax (Allahabad High Court) From the perusal of Section 74(5) of the Act, it is evident that a person chargeable with tax may, before service of notice under sub-section (1), pay the amount of tax and interest under Section 50 and penalty @ […]
The petition is filed by retired official o quash charges in respect of offences of cheating, criminal conspiracy and Corruption against CIT(A).
R.P. Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) In view of the submissions made at the bar and on perusal of the order dated 22.1.2020, it is clear that the rejection of the application is based upon the understanding that the GST TRAN-1 could not be filed on account of technical glitch […]
Jaymatajee Enterprise (Seller) And Another Vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) & 2 Others (Allahabad High Court) It is clear from the statute that the power of seizure of goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act can be resorted to only when the Officer exercising the said power has ‘reasons to believe’ that the goods […]
Jaitron Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of U. P. (Allahabad High Court) Admittedly, in the facts of the present case the petitioner did accept that the e-way bill with the vehicle did not contain correct description with regard to movement of goods. Another e-way bill (though not available with the vehicle, at the time of […]
Ravi Dixit Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the summoning order is without compliance of provisions of Section 138 of the Act, 1881; the application has been falsely implicated due to enmity and financial dispute with the complainant and that cheques were dishonoured as […]
After considering all the arguments advanced by the parties and the judgments relied upon by the parties and further considering to the nature of offence, its gravity and the evidence in support of it and the overall circumstances of this case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has not made out a case for bail.
Mayank Sikarwar Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) The petitioner had a registration under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which when the Assessing Authority cancelled on 19.9.2019 under Section 29(2)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act), the petitioner filed an application for the revocation of […]
