Torque Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India And 5 Others (Allahabad High Court) It is pertinent to mention that dealers in the State of Uttar Pradesh falling under the CGST Act/ U.P. GST Act and aggrieved with the orders of first appellate authority under Section 107, have been left remediless inasmuch as Appellate Tribunal […]
Vidyut Majdoor Kalyan Samiti Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) The contention that there is no provision of restoration of a GST registration, once it has been cancelled borders on the absurd. In case, no provision for its restoration has been made in the software, the same is not the fault of the petitioner […]
Explore the Allahabad High Court judgment on Anandeshwar Traders vs State of U.P. regarding e-way bill cancellation, transportation timelines, and additional evidence in tax matters.
Where the implication of a person was for a non-bailable offence, he could apply for anticipatory bail. If the applicant cooperated with the inquiry, there was no requirement of his arrest. Assessee was having his own address of residence and business. He could give surety ensuring his appearance. Therefore, he deserved to be granted limited protection for the purpose of conclusion of inquiry by the Proper Officer. Thus, Allahabad High Court granted the anticipatory bail to a person alleged of GST evasion to the tune of Rs.100 Crores.
Read about the court’s inquiry order in Ansari Construction vs Additional Commissioner GST (Appeals) case. System responsibility for harassment, liability fixation awaited
Bharat Forge Limited Vs Principal Chief Materials Manager Diesel Locomotive Works (Allahabad High Court) The HSN code (Harmonized System of Nomenclature) is provided for each product/service by GST Council to specify the rate at which GST would be applicable. The suppliers have to quote HSN Code of the product to be supplied by them in […]
Service of the show cause notice at a wrong E-mail address is neither contemplated under the Act nor can it be deemed to be a proper service under the Act. As no show cause notice has ever been served, the petitioner never had any occasion to file its reply and thereafter not serving a copy of the reasoned order quantifying the demand is clearly erroneous.
Shiv Dayal Singh Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) It is clear that once the operator/owner of the vehicle informs regarding surrender of registration certificate, a burden is cast upon the Taxation Officer to charge the tax and the additional tax only on being convinced that the vehicle is found plying as no tax […]
Sahibabad Printers Vs Additional Commissioner CGST (Appeals) And Others (Allahabad High Court) Counsel for the petitioner argues that as the show cause notice was silent, the petitioner could not have been expected to give any reply and further questioning the appellate order he argues that the appellate authority was wrong in recording that no document […]
Money laundering is a serious economic offence and serious threat to the national economy and national interest and, these offences are committed with cool calculation with the motive of personal gain regardless of the consequences on the society.
