Allahabad HC overturns penalty on Nanhey Mal Munna Lal due to typographical error in e-way bill; directs refund of any deposited amount.
Boroplus Antiseptic Cream was a ‘medicated ointmnet’ and was liable to be taxed at 5% under ‘drugs and medicines’ in Entry 41 Schedule II in absence of specific evidence including expert opinions, industry standards, etc. to justify the reclassification.
Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock found during inspection cannot justify confiscation under Section 130 of the GST Act. Case: Vijay Trading Co. vs. Commissioner.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that excess stock in a GST survey should trigger proceedings under Sections 73 & 74, not confiscation under Section 130.
Allahabad High Court sets aside GST orders against Shree Om Steels, ruling that proceedings under Section 130 of the UPGST Act were improperly initiated.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST orders against Havells India Ltd, citing a prior e-way bill download. Judgment follows Mahalaxmi Traders case precedent.
Allahabad HC dismisses Shiv Trading’s petition challenging GST penalty due to failure to prove genuine transactions and actual physical movement of goods.
Allahabad High Court held Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax guilty under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and imposed fine of Rs. 25,000 along with simple imprisonment for a period of one week.
Allahabad High Court ruled Section 130 of GST Act can’t be applied for excess stock found during search; Section 73/74 should be used for tax determination.
Allahabad HC rules that GST authorities can survey business premises for verifying transactions when goods are intercepted without proper documents.
