Allahabad High Court held that e-commerce intermediary i.e. Flipkart is not liable for the goods put up for the sale by the seller on its platform. Such e-commerce networks are exempted from liability under the I.T. Act, 2000.
Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) 1. In all these writ petitions seizure orders and notices issued under sections 129 (1) and (3), respectively, by various authorities, mainly on the ground that E-Way Bill-01 under U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as U.P.G.S.T ACT) […]
Om Prakash Mishra Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) A perusal of the Annexure no.2, makes it clear that no reasons whatsoever have been recorded while passing the order of cancellation of the registration of the petitioner’s firm. The order clearly being without any reason cannot be accepted to be an order in accordance […]
The Court held that it being an inter-State transfer of goods there was no requirement of carrying the U.P. State e-way bill – the insistence by the State authorities that the petitioner’s vehicle was not carrying the U.P. E-way bill is without any factual and legal basis
A.S. Enterprise Vs Commissioner of State Tax U.P. (Allahabad High court) The petitioner’s case was that the petitioner could not produce relevant documents at the time of inspection of goods in transit. The same (all documents) were produced at the time of physical verification. The authority declined to verify the same. The detaining authority formed […]
Brij Bihari Singh Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax Lucknow (Allahabad High Court) The statutory right of appeal is not an illusory remedy given to the assessee or a person aggrieved. It is an effective and real remedy granted within the structure of the statute to allow for redressal of genuine grievances. Therefore, the appeal forum (wherever […]
CIT Vs Dimpal Yadav (Allahabad High Court) In the instant case, we find that the Tribunal has given a categorical finding that the assessee had established a reasonable cause for failure to comply with the provision of Section 269SS of the Act. The Tribunal further found that the loan given by the Samajwadi Party was […]
High court held that payment of 10% mandatory pre-deposit for filing appeal u/s. 107(6) of CGST Act 2017 can be made by assessee from Electronic credit ledger and is is not mandatory that pre-deposit should have been made from the cash ledger.
Where order in Form GST DRC-07 as visible in GSTN Portal did not contain reasons, same was wholly defective and, hence was to be remitted back for fresh adjudication
Bail granted to one of the co-accused, can be a strong ground for another co-accused to also be enlarged on bail. Ashish Rajput Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)
