Ram Prasad Rajouriya Vs State of U.P. and others (Allahabad High Court) one of the two cherished basic values by Indian society for centuries is “satya” (truth) and the same has been put under the carpet by the petitioner. Truth constituted an integral part of the justice-delivery system in the pre-Independence era, however, post-Independence period […]
The only dispute has been raised by the counsel for the applicant before this Court is only that the estimate of 40 tons has wrongly been recorded by the authorities; whereas, no actual weightment was made by the surveying authority.
Anticipatory bail denied in PMLA case, applicant accused of money laundering. Enforcement Directorate cites forged documents and Rs.25,000 tainted money.
Section 6(2)(a) of the CGST Act mandates that where any proper officer under the CGST Act issues an order, he shall also issue an order under the SGST Act or the UTGST Act as authorized under those Acts, as the case may be, under intimation to the jurisdictional officer of the State tax or the Union territory Tax. Clause (2) of sub section (2) of Section 6 of the CGST Act/UPGST Act mandates that where a proper officer under the SGST Act or the UTGST Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject-matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under the CGST Act on the same subject-matter.
J.K Infratech Vs Additional Commissioner (Allahabad High Court) In this case it transpires, the GST registration cancellation order dated 17.9.2019 was passed ex-parte pursuant to a notice claimed to be served through the common portal. The petitioner could not reply to the same as he claimed lack of knowledge. Thereby, ex-parte order was passed on […]
Explore the legal implications of the non-establishment of GST Tribunal in Uttar Pradesh, leaving dealers remediless. Key questions referred to a Larger Bench.
Nanhey Mal Munna Lal Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Prima facie, perusal of Form GST DRC-01A under rule 142(1A) of the Rules indicates that it is a pre-show cause notice (Pre-SCN) intimation with reference to Section 73(1)/(5) or Section 74(1)/(5) to an assessee so that either he may deposit the amount of tax […]
Bharat Mint And Allied Chemicals Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court) The stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit that the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Act, can also not be accepted inasmuch as it is settled law […]
Daujee Abhushan Bhandar Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) Considering the provisions of Section 282 and 282 A of the Act, 1961 and the provisions of Section 13 of the Act, 2000 and meaning of the word “issue” we find that firstly notice shall be signed by the assessing authority and then […]
Gamma Gaana Limited Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) GST Refund Application cannot be rejected on mere ground of delay in the light of Supreme Court Order – High Court of Allahabad The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has declared in Gamma Gaana Limited Vs. Union of India & 3 others in Writ Tax […]
