Explore ITAT Indore’s order in ACIT Vs MP Warehousing case, challenging deduction under section 35AD for specified and non-specified business income.
In the Nano Infra Promoters Pvt Ltd vs ITO case at ITAT Kolkata, learn why receipts couldn’t be added to income under section 68 just for summons non-compliance.
Indore ITAT dismisses Abhishek Singh’s appeal against PCIT for filing belatedly, citing insufficient cause for the 6-year delay.
ITAT Delhi in Preeti Bhardwaj Vs ITO held that AO cannot treat cash deposits as unexplained when assessee has provided the source of cash deposits being cash withdrawals without bringing adverse material.
The case pertained to the disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 1,16,82,953/- paid on an unsecured loan. This ruling sheds light on the meticulous examination of evidence and the importance of substantiating claims in tax matters.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi): ITAT’s ruling on interest under Land Acquisition Act as capital receipt and exempt under Section 10(37) analyzed.
Rugby Regency P. Ltd appeals against denial of depreciation on windmills and addition of income under Section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act. Detailed analysis of the case from ITAT Delhi.
ITAT Mumbai held that non-examination of the details clearly makes the order of AO erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, PCIT correctly assumed the revisional jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that no addition is warranted under Sec 56(2)(x)(b)(B)(ii) of Income Tax Act when difference between purchase value and fair market value is less than 10%.
Explore the legal dispute between Kaarya Facilities and ITO over the interpretation of Section 36(1)(va). Due date for wages under scrutiny. ITAT Mumbai ruling analyzed.
