ITAT Mumbai allows Bhaskar Shah’s appeal on claiming Section 54F deduction for a triplex flat treated as a single residential unit. Key details of the ruling inside.
ITAT Hyderabad dismisses appeals by Smt. Lekha Reddy Mettu and others regarding capital gains from immovable property transactions. Key judgment details explained.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside PCIT’s order on a capital gains exemption claim under Section 54F. Details of the decision and legal interpretation explained.
Assessee has preferred an appeal before Addl/JCIT(A) who allowed the appeal by observing that the ICDS adjustments were made under the head ICDS-I & ICDS-VI relates to accounting policies and changes in the exchange rates.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT remanded back the matter to CIT (A) after observing that assessee was not able to attend the hearing before CIT (A) due to mismanagement of its state of affair.
ITAT Kolkata held that condonation of delay in filing of an appeal is liable to be allowed as sufficient cause shown. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) set aside and matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
On appeal CIT (A) observed that assessee used different PAN in Form 35 instead of one used for reassessment. Assessee neither file return in response to notice u/s 148 not it complied with the statutory notices.
ITAT Agra held that ex-parte dismissal of appeal, as notices issued by CIT(A) were not compiled, without adjudicating issues on merits is in violation of section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. Hence, order set aside and matter remitted back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that notice issued u/s. 274 without specifying ground for imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) i.e. whether penalty is imposed for concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income is not justifiable.
ITAT Delhi partly allowed FIL India’s appeal on tax adjustments, PF contributions, and double taxation of interest on refund under Income Tax Act provisions.
