This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT remanded the matter as assessee failed to explain holding of two PAN
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bundelkhand Ispat Melting Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bundelkhand Ispat Melting Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
As a result of search and seizure operation AO observed that assessee received unsecured loan of Rs. 28,00,000/- which he held as undisclosed income of the assessee. Case was reopened and statutory notices were issued, for which no compliance was made by the assessee. Penalty proceedings u/s 271 (1) (b) were initiated, for which no compliance was made by the assessee. AO made addition of Rs. 28 Lakh as undisclosed income and further added Rs. 70,000/- as commission paid for providing accommodation entry.
On appeal CIT (A) observed that ass...




