ITAT held that transfer of PAN is consequential to Order of transfer of jurisdiction & that it is a PAN, which follows jurisdiction & not vice versa
Vikas Bajoria Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) In present case, the petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2022, investigation as against him is complete, the amount of alleged tax evasion has already been deposited with the revenue by the recipient(s). This Court is in respectful agreement with the law laid down in the cases […]
Petitioner’s intended to take benefit of MEIS scheme. Thus, error of not marking ‘Y’ against reward column is clearly an inadvertent error.
Issue of inter-state/intra-state transaction is Ilegal issue & petitioner cannot be compelled to pay GST on services rendered by it twice.
Prosecution case is that applicant was ITO & demanded Rs.1 lakkh as bribe from partners of Brightera Builders for favourable assessment order
Hero Motocorp Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Instructions issued by Revenue Department needs to be aligned with the decisions taken by the courts and the position of law as declared by the judgments The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in M/s. Hero Motocorp Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors [Review […]
HC set aside the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee and held that the cancellation of the GST Registration through a non-speaking order without mentioning the grounds for such cancellation is cryptic in nature and violates the principles of natural justice.
Surcharge under Section 5A of OST Act is to be levied before deducting entry tax paid by dealer pursuant to Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999.
Pendency of arrear tax and penalty under Odisha Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1975 or Tax Recovery Proceeding or audit dues (IR) or VCR/E-challan or Prosecution Report shall not be a bar for cancellation of certificate or registration under Section 55 of MV Act.
Tribunal will examine whether the audit assessment is invalid on account of the delay in submission of the AVR in terms of Section 9-C (5) of the OET Act and in light of the decision of this Court in M/s. Chandrakanta Jayantilal, Cuttack
