Allowance of bad debt depends on how it is reflected in accounts
In this case, we are concerned with the question as to whether Samosa is to be treated as namkeen or cooked food and we are not asked to pronounce upon whether it is to be treated as unclassified items, the choice is narrowed down to whether it is to be treated as namkeen or as cooked food.
In the case of M/s Abhipra Capital Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Investigation), the Delhi High Court held that amount paid to National Stock Exchange (NSE) as non-adjustable deposit for acquisition of membership cannot be treated as revenue expenditure and the same would be termed as capital expenditure.
Ajesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. CIT (Rajasthan High Court) What is to be considered is that for being granted benefit under sub-section (37) of section 10 of the Act, the land in question should have been put to agricultural use by the assessee for the preceding two years. Even if we accept the contention of the […]
Abhay Solvents Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial (Karnataka High Court) In terms of Section 174(1)(f), it is clear that the repeal of the Act specified in Section 173 shall not affect any proceedings including that relating to an appeal, revision, review or reference, instituted before, on or after the appointed date, under the […]
Dissemination of Yoga or vedic philosophy or the practice of yoga or education with respect to yoga was well within the larger term ‘medical relief’ as covered within section 2(15).
Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) was right in exercising discretion and in refusing to admit the appeal preferred by the appellant in exercise of discretion vested under proviso (iii) to subsection (1) of Section 129A of Customs Act, 1952 (Act, for short)?
Batra Hospital Employees Union Vs. Batra Hospital & Medical Research (Delhi High Court) It would be hazardous to presume that every organization, which is certified under Section 80-G of the Income Tax Act, would, of necessity, be entitled, ipso facto, to immunity from the applicability of the Payment of Bonus Act. There is substance, in […]
The difference between the market value of the shares and the value of the transfer was held to constitute deemed gift under Section 4 and that amount was brought to tax. The Gawahati High Court found that the transfer was pursuant to a family settlement and stated that the provisions of the Gift Tax Act would not be applicable.
The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the repair and maintenance expenditure incurred by a Hotel is revenue expenditure under the Income Tax Act.
