CESTAT should not exercise its discretionary power in whimsical and arbitrary manner

Vaish Brother Through Partner Vs Commissioner of Customs (Delhi High Court)

It is not disputed that the respondent / revenue accepts that the appellant had right to file an appeal challenging the order of the first appellate authority confirming penalty imposed by the Order in Original before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 129A (1) of the Act. Proviso (iii) to sub-section 1 of Section 129A gives discretion to Tribunal to admit or not to admit an appeal where the amount of penalty determined does not exceed Rs.2.0 lakhs. That the discretion exists cannot be disp

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.