The Delhi High Court has granted a favorable judgment for GST refunds by excluding the period from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022, in the calculation of the limitation period.
Read about the Bombay High Court’s recent judgment in Kamlesh Kumar Mishra vs State of Maharashtra, allowing an advocate’s presence during interrogation under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Dive into the Delhi High Court’s decision in the case of Ohmi Industries Asia vs Assistant Commissioner, which paves the way for GST refunds on Market Research Services.
Understand the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs Kimberly Clark Lever Private Limited case regarding the reference to TPO and the scrutiny assessment as per the Income Tax Act 1961.
The J&K High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice on banned yarn shawl exports, asserting that the case’s jurisdiction lies in Delhi, not J&K.
Delhi High Court quashes a ₹10 crore tax demand, stating that an assessment order cannot be solely issued against one of the multiple legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer.
In a crucial verdict, the Bombay High Court allows BOCW cess refund to GE T and D India, emphasizing that supply contracts are outside the BOCW Cess Act’s purview.
HC held that if the deposit of tax had been already made and the Appellate Tribunal is not yet constituted then the rest of the demand shall remain stayed.
Rajasthan High Court in case of M/s B.C. Power Controls Ltd. v. Union of India held that refund application for IGST cannot be indefinitely delayed based on pendency of proceedings. Get full details and analysis here.
Gauhati High Court held that writ petition not entertained as alternative and efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner. Accordingly, tax payer directed to avail statutory remedy, which is more efficacious.
