Bombay High Court held that certificates issued by the Singapore Tax Authorities certifying that capital gain income would be brought to tax in Singapore is sufficient evidence for accepting the legal position.
HC set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority and remanded back the matter to Appellate Authority to pass a fresh speaking order after giving petitioners an opportunity of being heard, as the assessee had duly prepared the e-way bill within 3 minutes of the interception of the vehicle.
Telangana High Court allowed credit for advance tax and TDS resulting into refund of Rs. 51.66 Crores on upload of migration order which was earlier not able to be uploaded.
In a significant judgement by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the rights of taxpayers to claim input tax credit under the GST system were reinforced. In the case of Agrawal And Brothers vs Union Of India, the court ruled that the taxpayer should not suffer due to a supplier’s error in GST reporting.
The reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the information of alleged bogus political donations, has been challenged on the grounds of exceeding the limitation period. The High Court has instructed the Assessing Officer (AO) to refrain from passing the assessment order.
In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court granted the prayer of an assessee in GST proceedings to have their advocate present at a visible but not audible distance during interrogation. Learn more about the court’s decision and its implications.
Karnataka High Court held that exemption certificate from the Commissioner of Tourism, Government of Kerala exempting payment of sales tax is valid for 7 years and could not have been rescinded before the period of eligibility expired as it is sovereign assurance.
Explore the notable case of Nirajkumar Nareshkumar Lakhyani v. State of Gujarat (SCA No. 6777 of 2023) in which the Gujarat High Court has overturned the Adjudicating Authority’s ruling. The judgement allows the assessee to meet tax obligations in installments, effectively lifting the provisional attachment of their bank account. Learn more about this landmark tax case and its significant implications.
Delhi High Court held that as Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 doesn’t include ‘professional activity’ of lawyers as ‘commercial activity’. Accordingly, under the DMC Act there is no power to tax ‘professional activity’ carried out from residential building.
Karnataka High Court held that AO based on incorrect assumption treated the money collected by the trust as capitation fee under the KEI (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act. In absence of any violation of KEI (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, exemption u/s 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act duly available.
