Review of the Calcutta High Court’s judgment in the case Usha Gupta Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, exploring the implications for penalties in instances of shortage in consignment quantity.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition requesting certified copies of documents in the case of Manpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab. The court determined that the request had become infructuous due to subsequent events.
Madras High Court rules on Seoyon E-Hwa Summit Automotive India’s case, justifying rejection of rectification application under CGST Act due to assessee’s lack of cooperation during assessment process.
Allahabad High Court in Mohini Traders v. State of U.P., held that assessing authority must provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing an adverse order, regardless of whether assessee explicitly requested it
Judgment by Bombay High Court in C.P. Rabindranath Menon v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, which allows unregistered persons to claim GST refunds for the period before issuance of a refund policy.
Held that the petitioner is plying the vehicles in the Central Deposit Yard premises itself proves that the premises does not fall under the definition of ‘public place’ as under Section 2 sub Section (34) of the Act. Hence, motor vehicle tax not leviable.
Karnataka High Court provided guidelines relating to applicability of tax on works executed prior to 01.07.2017 and works executed after 01.07.2017 in case of where work contract is executed between the petitioners and the State/ other Government agencies.
In the case of Kalpataru Project International Ltd Vs Union of India, the Andhra Pradesh High Court examines the jurisdiction issue regarding a notice proposing revision of VAT refund. Stay of proceedings is granted until further orders. Get the full judgment and analysis in this article.
HC set aside the assessment order and held a proper opportunity must be given to the Assessee whenever a Show cause notice or an assessment order is issued and further commented that it is very difficult to file a reply to the Show Cause Notice within 12 hours.
The recent ruling from the Calcutta High Court in the case of Madalyns Tea Enterprise Vs Senior Joint Commissioner provides key insights into the issue of smuggling and bogus E-Way Bills. Learn about the Court’s decision on releasing a detained tea consignment amidst allegations of poppy seed smuggling.
