Read judgment of Sunil Enterprises vs. Commissioner Commercial Tax by Allahabad High Court. Court overturned Adjudicating Authority’s order, highlighting violation of natural justice principles when an order is passed prematurely.
Read about the Bombay High Court’s ruling in the case of Sunlight Cable Industries vs. The Commissioner of Customs NS II And 2 Ors., directing the refund of IGST along with interest at 7%. Analysis of the court’s decision and its implications.
Bombay High Court held that provisional attachment under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ceases to exist after a period of one year.
Read the full text of the judgment in the case of Ashok Kumar Sinha vs ACIT, where the Delhi High Court sets aside the assessment order and notices issued under the Income Tax Act, directing a re-examination of the material provided by the petitioner and a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer.
Calcutta High Court held that though the official liquidator is now in-charge of the affairs of the company, the petitioners being the erstwhile directors are to assist the official liquidator in affairs of the company even after winding up.
Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner and stated that the case is not fit for exercising discretionary power under section 438 of Cr.P.C. in the matter of dealing with prohibited drugs.
In a significant ruling, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, in the case of Perfect Enterprise v. State of West Bengal [W.P.A. No. 532 of 2023 dated June 15, 2023], overturned a penalty order issued by the Adjudicating Authority and subsequently upheld by the Appellate Authority. The court held that no penalty should be imposed on a bonafide assessee if the e-way bill expires during the transportation of goods due to a national holiday.
The Delhi High Court overturns a previous ruling, stating that participants can challenge the result of an audit. Learn about the Court’s rationale and its implications for the future.
The Delhi High Court has granted a favorable judgment for GST refunds by excluding the period from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022, in the calculation of the limitation period.
Read about the Bombay High Court’s recent judgment in Kamlesh Kumar Mishra vs State of Maharashtra, allowing an advocate’s presence during interrogation under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
