Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dayanand Pandey Vs State of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dayanand Pandey Vs State of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner and stated that the case is not fit for exercising discretionary power under section 438 of Cr.P.C. in the matter of dealing with prohibited drugs. Facts- Petitioner has approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.PC’), seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.314 of 2021, dated 24.08.2021, registered under Sections 21, 22 and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (in ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930