CESTAT Kolkata held that onus cast on appellant u/s 123 not having been discharged, hence concluded that contraband gold smuggled from a third country of origin is liable to absolute confiscation.
Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling in Mentor Graphics India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Tax Hyderabad regarding Cenvat credit eligibility for input services.
Analysis of the CESTAT Chennai ruling in Paper and Allied Conversions vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, focusing on service tax on reimbursable expenses.
Explore the legal implications of MGF Motors Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise on the non-imposition of service tax for free car repairs under warranty.
In Mars Mountain Security Services vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Kolkata clarified non-taxability of Man-Power services before June 16, 2005.
CESTAT Bangalore allows a timber import company to refund customs and special additional duty on unsold goods, providing a key precedent for the industry.
Spent earth (By-Product)arising in oil refining, bleaching process arising is not liable to Excise duty -Awn Agro P Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
A detailed analysis of the case between Hiranandani Builders and Commissioner of Service Tax-VII in CESTAT Mumbai. Learn how the Tribunal ruled that Revenue has no authority to collect service tax from SEZ Developers.
Analysis of CESTAT Kolkata’s judgment in Nitco World Travels vs Commissioner of Service Tax. How it impacts the taxation on commission from Amadeus India.
CESTAT Mumbai held that refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of input services duly available even if there is export without payment of service tax.
