Delhi High Court held that denial of Cenvat Credit merely because invoice contained incorrect address unjustified as invoice contained all the requisite particulars as required under proviso to Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that sugar boiled confectionery Kopiko is more specifically classifiable under Central Excise Tariff Heading [CETH] 1704 9090 and not under CETH 2101 as claimed by department.
CESTAT Delhi held that the amount of redemption fine imposed by the Commissioner in the impugned order is equal to the value of the goods itself, the same is harsh, accordingly, concluded that the amount of redemption fine must be reduced.
CESTAT Bangalore held that rejecting request for amendment of declared value in bill of entry (BOE) without awaiting outcome of DRI investigation not justified. Accordingly, order set aside and matter remanded back to adjudication authority.
CESTAT Chennai held that the imported Clear Float Glass is more appropriately classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 7005 1090 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and thus is eligible for exemption of the benefit of the Notification No. 46/2011-Cus dated 01.06.2011.
CESTAT Bangalore held that import of brushless DC/Axial fans meant for use in electronic industry should be valued at Transaction Value under Section 4 of Central Excise Act and accordingly, demand of Countervailing Duty on the same unsustainable.
CESTAT Bangalore held that cross-model utilisation of discount resulting into undervaluation are inadmissible under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of ATA Freightline, setting aside service tax demands for logistics services from April 2015 to June 2017. Full details of the case.
CESTAT Mumbai overturned the service tax demand on Hindustan Construction Co., ruling that reimbursements to group companies do not constitute taxable services.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that penalty on the employee of CHA (Customs House Agent) cannot be imposed on the charge of wrong availment of drawback by the exporter as proven that he has not been benefited by attempt to claim excess drawback by exporter.
