Analysis of Raj Metals & Alloys Vs. Commissioner of Customs case by CESTAT Delhi. Detailed examination of erroneous classification and penalties under Customs Act.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Chennai order regarding mis-declaration of goods, penalty under Customs Act 1962, and setting aside of penalties and fines.
Dive into the case of Puthuval Associates vs. Commissioner of Customs regarding anti-dumping duty on green reflective glass from January 4th to May 22nd, 2009, analyzed in a CESTAT Bangalore order.
CESTAT held that interpretation of policy provisions lies within jurisdiction of DGFT, whose opinion is binding. Therefore, restriction applied by Customs Department was deemed unsustainable.
CESTAT Bangalore sets aside penalty imposed under Customs Act on Orbit Trans Express & Freight Pvt. Ltd. Allegations of dummy import debunked. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
Discover the CESTAT Bangalore judgment on Pigeon International vs. Commissioner of Customs. Analysis of penalties, violations, and conclusions.
CESTAT Kolkata reduces penalty in Mittal Iron Foundry case, stating clandestine removal claims lack corroborative evidence.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside order rejecting customs refund for Doowon Electronics, citing lack of proper communication and natural justice violations.
Interest and penalty in relation to CVD cannot be demanded in the absence of specific provisions for levy of interest, penalty in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
In Kancor Ingredients Ltd vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad), the court rules that accumulated Cenvat Credit refund is valid for goods exported without a bond.
