Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hiranandani Builders Vs Commissioner of Service Tax-VII (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 86258 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/08/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hiranandani Builders Vs Commissioner of Service Tax-VII (CESTAT Mumbai)

Introduction: The CESTAT Mumbai recently released an order in the case between Hiranandani Builders and the Commissioner of Service Tax-VII. The judgment set a precedent, stating that the Revenue has no authority to collect service tax from developers of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) when providing services to units within the SEZ. This article dissects the case, examining its implications and the specific laws and notifications involved.

Background and Brief Facts: The appellant, Hiranandani Builders, is a registered Service Tax entity. The Revenue department subjected the company’s records to an audit, revealing that they received payments for lease rent and maintenance services provided to various units, including those in SEZs. The original authority imposed service tax demands and penalties, invoking multiple sections of the Finance Act, 1994.

Legal Framework Involved

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031