CESTAT Chennai held that demand invoking extended period cannot be sustained on account of revenue-neutrality as duty charged by Unit-I would be taken as cenvat credit by Unit-II.
CESTAT Delhi held that work orders include the charge supply of goods and fixing and finishing of tiles/granite/marbles such composite contracts involving both supply of goods and services are rightly classifiable under ‘work contract services’.
CESTAT Delhi held that where the duty becomes refundable as a consequence of judgement decree order or direction of appellate authority Appellate Tribunal or any Court, the date of such judgement decree, order or direction shall be the relevant date.
Analysis of the CESTAT Bangalore order in the case of DLF Southern Towns Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs where violation of import policy led to confiscation and penalty.
Comprehensive review and implications of the CESTAT Ahmedabads decision in the Modest Infrastructure Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case.
Detailed review and implications of CESTAT Ahmedabads judgment in the case of West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on the Goodluck Empire Vs CCE & ST case involving penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Explore the landmark CESTAT Ahmedabad order on whether service tax is applicable to software activation charges under Business Auxiliary Service in the case of Avaya Global Connect Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST
The CESTAT Chandigarh has ruled in favor of Mankoo Machine Tools in a pivotal case on SSI exemptions. This decision clarifies that family surnames can be used across separate entities without forfeiting SSI exemptions.
CESTAT held that post facto production of certificate entitled appellant to benefits of Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE. CESTAT Cited Supreme Court decision in case of Tullow India Operations Ltd.
