Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gannon Dunkerly & Co Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 171 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gannon Dunkerly & Co Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata)

Introduction: In a recent legal development, the Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the post facto production of certificates by an assessee entitles them to claim an exemption under the Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE dated 28.08.1995. The judgment was given in the case of ‘Gannon Dunkerly & Co Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX’, and it clears the air on the issue of timing of certificate production for claiming exemption under the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The CESTAT decision revolved around two main issues. Firstly, whether the appeal under section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 filed by the adjudicating authority before the Ld.Commissioner(Appeals) was maintainable or not. The Tribunal held that as per section 35E(2), the Commissioner of Central Excise can direct the adjudicating authority to file an appeal, rendering the appeal valid.

Secondly, the Tribunal examined if the post facto production of the certificate entitled the appellant to the benefits of the Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE. Citing a Supreme Court decision in the case of Tullow India Operations Ltd., the Tribunal ruled that a post facto production of the certificate was permissible and thus, the appellant was entitled to claim the exemption benefits.

Conclusion: The CESTAT’s decision affirms the legal principle that administrative requirements should not be used oppressively to deny substantive rights. While compliance with procedures is vital, the timing of the certificate’s production should not obstruct an entity’s legitimate claim to exemption benefits, particularly when the eligibility criteria are met. This ruling brings much-needed relief to assessees who may have been denied their rights to exemption due to procedural issues, thus demonstrating a balanced approach between procedural compliance and substantive justice.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031