Discover how CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of Guru Shipping & Clearing Pvt Ltd, waiving penalties due to a lack of evidence for tax evasion. Full text of the order.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside excise duty demand on silk yarn, ruling that the transaction value cannot be rejected without cogent reasons. Full text of the order.
Explore the Bagadiya Brothers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) case regarding the determination of duty on iron ore fines based on WMT.
Explore the case of Commissioner of Customs (Port) vs. B R Marbles Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Kolkata) where penalties and interest were waived due to court-ordered delays.
CESTAT held that here is no liability to pay tax under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on construction of Dykes, Internal Roads and other civil miscellaneous works during the period under dispute which is prior to 01.06.2007
CESTAT Chandigarh held that that waste, gums, fatty acids etc. arising during the course of manufacture of vegetable oils are eligible for the exemption Notification No.89/95-CE dated 18.09.1995.
In the case of Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Chandigarh quashes service tax demand due to insufficient evidence.
CESTAT Delhi held that refund of excise duty paid on Henna Powder and Henna Paste in terms of notification no. 11/2017-CE (NT) dated 24.04.2017 rejected as refund claim was not filed within a period of six months from the date of issuance of notification.
CESTAT Chennai held that all taxable services provided for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy are exempt from the liability to service tax during the impugned period. Accordingly, demand of service tax, interest and penalty set aside.
Analysis of CESTAT Delhi’s decision in Shakti Pumps (India) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Goods & Service regarding the denial of interest on a refund of Cenvat Credit.
