CESTAT Chennai sets aside order rejecting customs refund for Doowon Electronics, citing lack of proper communication and natural justice violations.
Interest and penalty in relation to CVD cannot be demanded in the absence of specific provisions for levy of interest, penalty in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
In Kancor Ingredients Ltd vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad), the court rules that accumulated Cenvat Credit refund is valid for goods exported without a bond.
Religious body not liable to pay service tax prior to 01.07.2012 on renting of immovable property: CESTAT Chennai: Church of South India Trust Association Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Delhi rules on the National Engineering Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise case, focusing on service tax refunds and judicial discipline.
Detailed analysis of Rajat International’s appeal against Customs duty, interest, and penalty for importing plastic broomsticks. Learn about the classification dispute and legal arguments.
CESTAT Bangalore directs re-adjudication rejecting appeals on classification of imported insoluble sulphur. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
CESTAT Bangalore rules on Mineral Enterprises Ltd. case, emphasizing no extended limitation for de-bonding burnt goods amid riots. Detailed analysis inside.
CESTAT Delhi upheld penalties on Jayant Vikram for misdeclaration of goods to claim ineligible drawback. Detailed analysis of the case and legal implications.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
