CESTAT Bangalore quashes violation allegations against Ajay Overseas Shipping, emphasizing brokers’ duty to advise clients on law compliance. Full order review.
CESTAT Allahabad quashes service tax demand on Indus Valley Partners, ruling classification based on non-existing provision is bad in law.
CESTAT Allahabad rules on LG Electronics India vs Commissioner of Central Excise, emphasizing procedural violations are not suppression for extended limitation.
Delhi CESTAT rules that service tax is payable on space provided on bus roofs for parcels, not on goods transport services. Exemption under Notification No.25/2012 applies.
CESTAT Chandigarh partly allowed Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.’s appeal against Service Tax demand, highlighting that tax under reverse charge applies when distributors incur reimbursable expenses for the taxable person. Dive into the case and understand the intricacies of the reverse charge mechanism.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that waste and scrap, even if exceeding SION norms, are exempt from customs duty provided they are cleared with proper permissions and duty payments.
Explore the CESTAT Kolkata verdict on CENVAT Credit for steel items. Detailed analysis, rulings, and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Jewel Utensils Industries, confirming compliance with export obligations under the Advance Authorization Scheme, exempting all duties.
Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling: No service tax on freight margin recovered from customers in outbound shipment cases. Analysis & implications discussed.
Compelling imperative consequent upon contradictory reports cannot be ignored. For central excise authorities to assume antipodal positions is neither becoming nor legally proper
