Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Schunk Metal and Carbon (India) Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 21832 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/11/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Schunk Metal and Carbon (India) Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

Introduction: In a significant decision, CESTAT Bangalore addressed the inclusion of royalty in transaction value under Customs Valuation Rules 2007. The case, Schunk Metal and Carbon (India) Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs, focused on arm’s length pricing and the validity of adding 5% royalty under Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules.

Detailed Analysis:

M/s. Schunk Metal and Carbon India Pvt. Ltd. imported materials from associated companies, with accepted transaction values under Rule 3(3)(a) of Customs Valuation Rules 2007. Despite recognizing related-party status, authorities allowed the declared prices, except for adding 5% royalty on carbon brushes.

The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the royalty addition, assuming an implicit condition to buy only from related suppliers. The appellant contended that, once arm’s length pricing was accepted, adding royalty was legally unsustainable.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031