In the case of Vidya Herbs Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, the CESTAT Bangalore ruled on the denial of benefits for coffee beans import under a notification. Get the full analysis here.
Smaaash Leisure Limited wins against Commissioner of CGST. CESTAT Delhi rules bowling alley income exempt from service tax. Details of the case explained.
Dive into the classification dispute between Continental Automotive Brake Systems India and Customs over Electronic Control Units (ECUs) in this detailed analysis of CESTAT Delhi’s order.
CESTAT Chennai in United India Insurance Company Limited vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise held that adjudicating authorities cannot review previous orders via corrigendum.
CESTAT Hyderabad ruled that confiscating gold without corroborative evidence is unjust. Learn about the case of Kogatam Sadik Basha Vs Commissioner of Central Tax Preventive.
CESTAT Delhi upholds penalties on Himachal Fashion Pvt Ltd for diverting imported fabrics, denying Customs Act benefits. Full text of the order and analysis.
Learn about the customs duty dispute over MIKO II’s classification. Analysis reveals its advanced technology warrants ‘automatic data processing machine’ status.
SNQS International Socks Private Limited Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) In the complex landscape of taxation and regulatory compliance, the classification of services plays a crucial role in determining the tax liabilities of businesses. The case of SNQS International Socks Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of GST delves into this intricate issue, […]
CESTAT Chennai held that imported goods being handheld machines popularly known as brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84672900 and parts of brush cutter is classifiable under CTH 84679900.
CESTAT Chandigarh deems consolidated hearing notice with multiple dates a violation of natural justice, remanding an ex parte order. Analysis and implications discussed.
