CESTAT Kolkata condones appeal delay due to lack of proof on service date in A.S. Enterprise vs. Customs case. Remands for merit-based review in 3 months.
The CESTAT Mumbai remands the forfeiture case of M/s Daroowala Bros & Co to the licensing authority for reconsideration based on new circumstances.
CESTAT Delhi confirms no penalty for Sarang Wadhawan under Customs Act Section 114AA, finding no false declaration in the import of an aircraft.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad remands the claim of Rs. 1,57,818/- to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration based on new evidence.
Flextronics Technologies India Private Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) In the case of Flextronics Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Chennai examined the classification and duty exemption of connectors imported by the appellant. Flextronics filed an appeal against an order by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), Chennai, which upheld the […]
CESTAT Chennai held that the Investigation Report is administrative and fact finding in nature as it does not purport to decide the lis or contest between the contending parties by a statutory authority. Thus, investigation report is not appealable order.
CESTAT Chennai held that benefit of Basic Customs Duty BCD under notification no. 25/2005 eligible in case of import of ‘Digital Still Image Video Cameras’. Accordingly, appeal allowed with consequential benefits.
Glass Beads (rockies) were imported against bills of entry. Some quantity which is covered by first of bills was re-assessed at US$ 1.60/Kg while consignment in subsequent shipments was re-assessed at US$ 1.75/Kg.
CESTAT Kolkata rules in Vedanta Ltd. case: CRCL’s delayed test report after 218 days invalidates export duty assessment, favoring refund claim for iron ore exports.
He observed that appellant furnished fake and bogus bills of purchase from purported buyers other than actual suppliers in connection with the export of overvalued goods to claim ineligible drawback.
