In re Kunal Structure (India) Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) The moot issue here is to decide whether the construction service provided by the applicant in the capacity of sub-contractor to the main contractor who were in turn providing services to Central Government, State Government, Union territory, a local authority, a Governmental Authority or a […]
In re Vadilal Industries Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: What would be the classification of ‘Flavored Milk’ sold under trade name of Power Sip? Answer: ‘Flavoured milk’ is classifiable under Tariff Item 2202 99 30 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as a ‘beverage containing milk’. Also Read AAAR Order: ‘Power Sip’ […]
In re Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: What would be the classification of Flavoured Milk? Answer : ‘Flavoured milk’ is classifiable under Tariff Item 2202 99 30 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as a ‘beverage containing milk’. Also Read AAAR Order: Flavoured Milk’ classifiable under Tariff Item […]
In re Apar Industries ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: Whether the applicability or determination of liability to pay Tax on supply of ‘Solar HT XLPE & LT XLPE Cables’, for use as Parts in the manufacture of Solar Power Generating System at 5% GST rate is legally correct and in order in terms of Schedule-I […]
In re Apar Industries Limited (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: Whether the applicability or determination of liability to pay Tax on supply of ‘Solar DC Cables’, for use as Parts in the manufacture of Solar Power Generating System at 5% GST rate is legally correct and in order in terms of Schedule-I of Notification No.01 / […]
The applicant is liable to pay GST on reverse charge basis on amount paid for reimbursement of Stamp tax paid by the supplier M/s. Enpay Turkey on behalf of the applicant, since the supplier of the applicant does not fulfil/satisfy all the conditions required for being a ‘Pure agent’ in terms of the provisions of Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017 for the reasons discussed hereinabove.
In re Mohitkumar Mahendrabhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) We, therefore, find that the applicant has neither filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 nor paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/-as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the […]
In re M/s. Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) We, therefore, find that the applicant has not paid the fees of Rs.10,000/- under the proper head i.e. ‘CGST’ and ‘GGST’ as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules where as paid fees of Rs. 10,000/- under “IGST” head. Therefore, the instant […]
In re Gujarat State Road Development Corporation ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required, they have not filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section […]
In re Ashokkumar Khimjibhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01, they have not paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST […]
