In re KSR & Company (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) The Applicant is eligible for Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of the GST paid on goods and services used as inputs in execution of “Works Contracts’. Input Tax Credit restriction under section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) will not apply to the applicant as his output is […]
In re Metro Aluminium (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Irrespective of the end use of the ladders whether for domestic purpose or for Commercial use, Aluminium ladders come under HSN code 7616, ‘Other articles of Aluminium’ and accordingly attract Tax rate of 18% (9% CGST+9% SGST). FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, ANDHRA […]
Applicant, sought Advance Ruling in Place of Supply issue, which is outside the purview of the Advance Ruling Authority as per Section 97(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Hence the application is not admitted under Sec 98 (2) of CGST Act, 2017 and APGST Act, 2017.
In re GVS projects Private limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the value of materials recovered from our RA bills issued on cost recovery basis by APSPDCL is liable to tax under RCM as per Notification No.13/2017 Central Tax Rate dated 28.06.2017 or not ? The value of materials recovered on cost recovery basis by […]
The above works undertaken by APEPDCL are for business purpose and the benefit of Concessional Rate of 12% (6% under Central tax and 6% State tax) are any other concessional rate is NOT available to the applicant.
The said entry clearly states that the services supplied by Electricity Distribution Utilities attract nil rate of tax. Whereas, the said entry do not prescribe any nil rate for the services supplied to the Electricity Distribution Utilities. Therefore, the said exemption is not applicable to the services rendered by the applicant to the Contractee.
Whether ‘Liquidated Damages’ and other penalties like milestone penalties levied on suppliers/ contractors in the nature of making good the damages for any delays in supply of service or goods in the following cases are exigible to GST or not?
An applicant can seek an advance ruling in relation to supply of goods or services or both undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. Further, as per Section 103 (1) of the APGST Act such an Advance Ruling is binding only on the applicant and on the Officer Concerned or the jurisdictional Officer in respect of the applicant.
Now the works under discussion have been undertaken to execute/implement various schemes for constructing sub stations, erection of distribution transformers, implementation of World Bank Projects etc.. Moreover, the above works undertaken by APEPDCL are for business purpose and the benefit of Concessional Rate of 12% (6% under Central tax and 6% State tax) as per notification is not available to the applicant.
In re Pragathi Enterprises (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Applicant has sough advance ruling on following issues- 1. What is the rate of GST applicable on tobacco leaves procured at tobacco auction platforms or directly from farmers, which are cured and dried by farmers themselves? 2. If the applicant purchases tobacco leaves form other dealers who […]
