Case Law Details
Case Name : UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs Electrosteel Castings Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs Electrosteel Castings Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Deed of Undertaking Is Not a Guarantee: Resolution Plan Does Not Extinguish Rights Against Third-Party Security Providers Unless Debt Is Fully Satisfied
The Supreme Court held that Clause 2.2 of the Deed of Undertaking executed by Electrosteel Castings Limited (ECL) did not constitute a “contract of guarantee” under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The clause merely imposed an obligation on ECL, as promoter, to arrange infusion of funds into the borrower (ESL) to ensure compliance...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


