Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs Electrosteel Castings Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs Electrosteel Castings Limited (Supreme Court of India) Deed of Undertaking Is Not a Guarantee: Resolution Plan Does Not Extinguish Rights Against Third-Party Security Providers Unless Debt Is Fully Satisfied The Supreme Court held that Clause 2.2 of the Deed of Undertaking executed by Electrosteel Castings Limited (ECL) did not constitute a “contract of guarantee” under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The clause merely imposed an obligation on ECL, as promoter, to arrange infusion of funds into the borrower (ESL) to ensure compliance...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031