Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Article examines LLM risks in tax practice and outlines a framework for verification, confidentiality, citation checks, and profes...
Corporate Law : A UAE visa or company does not establish tax residency. Tax depends on residence tests, income, management, and supporting evidenc...
Corporate Law : P&H HC refused regular bail under the UAPA, holding prima facie material linked the accused to the alleged conspiracy and funding ...
Corporate Law : Article examines persistent exam paper leaks, their causes, impact on students, and suggests technology, stricter enforcement, eth...
Corporate Law : Explains how email exchanges may contribute to contracts under Indian law, covering the Indian Contract Act, IT Act, 2000, and Bha...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines the FCRA framework, proposed 2026 Amendment Bill and notified Rules covering registration, reporting, asset vesting a...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines the FCRA 2026 Amendment Bill and revised Rules, covering registration, reporting, asset vesting, renewal, investigati...
Corporate Law : DRI dismantled an alleged Mephedrone manufacturing facility in Ankleshwar, seized drugs, chemicals and ₹21 lakh, and arrested th...
Corporate Law : MSME Ministry outlines CGTMSE measures including ₹10 crore guarantee ceiling, reduced AGF, enhanced coverage and awareness initi...
Corporate Law : Government outlines FTAs, Export Promotion Mission, e-commerce export reforms and logistics initiatives to diversify export market...
Corporate Law : HC upheld quashing of a vague wilful defaulter notice but allowed fresh proceedings under the RBI Master Circular with proper part...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court dissolved marriage under Article 142 citing irretrievable breakdown after over a decade of separation, while allowin...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that IBC moratorium against corporate and personal guarantors does not bar recovery proceedings against a princ...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court dismissed a challenge to deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, holding the second application was maintain...
Corporate Law : SC held Section 35 of the Stamp Act did not bar secondary evidence where the 1988 agreement was not chargeable with stamp duty at ...
Corporate Law : IRDAI directs insurers to submit SCNs within 7 days, additional documents within 3 days, and clear pending requests within 30 days...
Corporate Law : Instruction No. 124 dated July 23, 2026 directs RFID seals for SEZ export containers under valid LEOs to ensure uniform acceptance...
Corporate Law : Notification S.O. 4049(E) amends the PMLA Special Courts notification, designating additional courts and jurisdiction in Gujarat f...
Corporate Law : DPIIT Press Note No. 3 of 2026 permits inventory-based e-commerce for exports of goods made in India, effective from the date of t...
Corporate Law : Government notifies the Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme, 2026, replacing the 1952 Scheme and introducing updated EPF, enrolmen...
Rudra Appellant(s) versus Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. & another Respondent(s) – Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — section 166 — claim petition under — the Tribunal concluded that merely because the appellant had consumed alcohol did not mean that the driver of the vehicle did not need to drive the vehicle cautiously. Thus, the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle as a result of which the appellant sustained injuries. The Tribunal awarded total compensation amounted to Rs.40,000/- with interest @ 8% p.a. — the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.1,48,200/- with interest @ 6% p.a. — appeal for enhancement of compensation — the doctor assessed whole body disability at 29% and also stated that the nature of disability is such that the appellant cannot work as a coolie or do any other manual work — the impugned judgment of the High Court modified, awarding Rs.3,00,000/- with interest of 6% p.a. on the enhanced sum — appeal allowed — no costs.
The use of internet is growing rapidly in India. Buyers of Insurance products increasingly access / visit websites to know the features and to compare prices of the products offered by different insurers. This has led to the emergence of dedicated websites known as ‘web aggregators’ offering information on insurance products. The concept of web aggregator is of online enquiry or shopping where a client could get information and premium quotes on all types of policies across Insurance companies at one point.
Various benches of the high court have taken different stands on the issue of relationship between the employer and such workers. SC framed three questions for the larger bench. The first and main one is “whether a person who is employed by a contractor who undertakes contracts for the execution of any of the whole of the work or any part of the work which is ordinarily work of the undertaking is an employee under the Act?”
the ld. Magistrate viewed that imposition of a fine payable as compensation to the Appellant was sufficient to meet the ends of justice in the instant case. The High Court confirmed the order of the ld. Magistrate, with an increased fine — the Supreme Court held no interference with the order of the High Court, except to the extent of increasing the amount of compensation payable by a further sum of Rs.2 lakhs — appeal partly allowed.
The Authority had investigated Actuarial valuation of the Indian Motor Third Party Insurance Pool (IMTPIP) under the Insurance Act, 1938 in order to assess the adequacy of the reserves which are to be calculated as per the IRDA Regulations and in particular as per reference 4 cited. The Report established that the ultimate loss ratios are 172.3%, 181.81,% and 194.15% for the years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively. Against this estimate, the pool has maintained reserves at 126% for all the years the pool has underwritten third party motor liability. The report under Ref No. 1 was communicated vide letter cited under Ref No. 2 to the CMD, GIC, the pool Administrator and a meeting of the General Insurance Council was convened for consideration of the Report cited at 1 above. The General Insurance Council, responded vide letter cited under Ref No. 3 on behalf of the members of the pool.
The IRDA had conducted an audit of the Third Party Motor Insurance Pool and has established that the pool reserves have to be significantly augmented in order to meet the higher compensation to be paid to the unfortunate victims of road accidents. Such augmenting of reserves will strengthen the insurance companies and will enable them to meet all claim obligations at all times expeditiously and without fail, The IRDA has required all general insurance companies to increase these reserves in a phased manner over a period of three years and till the reserves are augmented to a satisfactory level, companies have also been required to restrict theft expenditure in terms of bonuses. incentives etc., besides bringing in additional capital as might be necessitated.
EPFO has launched a SMS based service for the benefit of all stakeholders. While submitting your claims, write your mobile number on top of the form. Attach a clear photocopy of first page of your bank passbook. A SMS will be sent to the mobile number about the status of your claim.
Delay in deposit of P.F. dues attracts penal damages. Damages are levied at the following FLAT RATES: * For 0 — 2 months delay – @ 5 % p.a. * For 2 — 4 months delay – @10 % p.a. * For 4 — 6 months delay – @ 15 % p.a. * For delay above 6 months – @ 25 % p.a. (subject to a maximum of 100%)
If the Bar Council of India has its way, all advocates in the country will soon have to accept fees only by cheque. And if the payment is to be made in cash, proper receipts must be furnished to the client and a register of the same will be required to be maintained by advocates.
The respondent raised certain claims against the appellant and invoked the arbitration agreement — the appointed Arbitrator adjusted Rs.11,10,662 awarded to the appellant, towards the sum of Rs.91,33,844 awarded in favour of the respondent and consequently directed the appellant to pay to the respondent, the balance of Rs.80,23,182 — the appellant paid the said amount to the respondent and filed a petition under section 11 of the Act praying for appointment of an arbitrator to decide its claim for the extra cost in getting the work completed through the alternative agency — the High Court dismissed the said application and held that the application under section 11 of the Act by the appellant was misconceived, barred by res judicata, and mala fide — appeal —
