Reverse CIRP: A Pathway to Completing Stalled Housing Projects and Protecting Homebuyers
For many Indian families, buying a home is a lifelong dream built on years of savings and hope. Unfortunately, several real estate projects across the country have remained incomplete due to the financial troubles of developers. When these companies enter insolvency, buyers often end up waiting for years for the keys to their homes. In such a situation, the concept of Reverse Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (Reverse CIRP) has emerged as an important tool for both saving stalled housing projects and protecting the rights of homebuyers.
The Challenge in Real Estate Insolvency
Over the past few years, hundreds of real estate companies have faced insolvency due to financial distress. Construction delays, cost overruns, and poor fund management have left projects half-built. Under the standard Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) defined by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a company in default goes through a resolution procedure where new investors or resolution applicants take over the company. The creditors—mainly banks and financial institutions—initiate the process to recover their dues.
However, in the real estate sector, this model often failed to deliver results. Unlike manufacturing or service companies, real estate developers have projects directly linked to homebuyers. The buyers are not just creditors; they are future occupants of the properties being built. In the traditional CIRP, once the insolvency process begins, construction stops until a resolution plan is approved. This halts project progress, creating uncertainty for homebuyers.
Moreover, under Section 29A of the IBC, promoters or persons related to the debtor company are barred from submitting a resolution plan. This clause was meant to prevent defaulting promoters from regaining control of their companies at discounted values. While this rule made sense for many industries, it created problems in real estate, where continuing the same project often required the original promoter’s involvement.
The Need for a Different Approach
In real estate projects, the central goal is different from other insolvency cases. While banks or operational creditors usually aim to recover the money owed, homebuyers primarily want possession of their flats, not a refund. In many cases, refunding the amount is neither practical nor fair, as it does not solve the emotional and financial investment made by homebuyers.
Recognizing these challenges, Indian courts and insolvency authorities began exploring alternative mechanisms to ensure project completion. This led to the development of the concept known as Reverse CIRP—a modified resolution process specifically designed for real estate insolvency.
Understanding Reverse CIRP
Reverse CIRP operates in a reversed structure compared to the traditional insolvency mechanism. Instead of replacing the promoter or developer completely, it allows them—or their related entities—to act as lenders to the corporate debtor. In simpler terms, the promoter can bring in funds to complete the construction of pending projects.
This arrangement is unique because it blends the principles of insolvency law with the practical realities of housing development. The promoter, despite being associated with the defaulting company, is permitted to participate not as a resolution applicant but as a financial contributor. The money infused by them is used only for completing the unfinished project for the benefit of homebuyers. Once the project is finished and possession is handed over, the funds recovered from unsold units or other sources may be used to return the promoter’s contribution, as approved by the resolution professional and the committee of creditors.
Key Objectives of Reverse CIRP
The primary aim of Reverse CIRP is to ensure timely completion of construction and delivery of homes to buyers. By keeping the project as a “going concern,” it prevents the wasteful liquidation of assets. Real estate projects are meaningful only when completed; half-built structures have little market value. Therefore, the focus shifts from dissolving the company to reviving its projects for the benefit of all stakeholders.
In many real estate insolvency cases, liquidation would only create further loss for both financial creditors and homebuyers. Under liquidation, the land and partly constructed buildings are sold, often at a fraction of their original value. Reverse CIRP avoids this outcome by preserving the project’s value and ensuring that the end-users—the homebuyers—receive the benefit they initially sought.
Judicial Support for Reverse CIRP
The concept of Reverse CIRP was first recognized by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in cases involving large real estate developers. In several judgments, the tribunal observed that traditional insolvency proceedings were inadequate for real estate companies because each project functions as a separate unit with distinct creditors and homebuyers. The tribunal allowed promoters to infuse funds under proper supervision, provided that the money was ring-fenced and used solely for completing ongoing projects.
These orders emphasized that all stakeholders—financial institutions, homebuyers, promoters, and resolution professionals—must work collaboratively to finish the project. It was also clarified that the promoter’s contribution should not give them automatic control over the company again; their role remains limited to funding and operational support under court or resolution professional supervision.
How Reverse CIRP Works in Practice
When a real estate developer enters insolvency:
1. The resolution professional identifies the ongoing projects and their stage of completion.
2. Separate accounts are maintained for each project to ensure transparency.
3. The promoter or related party expresses willingness to fund the construction for a particular project.
4. The committee of creditors and resolution professional evaluate and approve the fund infusion plan.
5. The promoter acts as a lender, and the funds are monitored carefully to ensure they are used only for construction purposes.
6. Once the project is completed, the possession of flats is handed over to homebuyers.
This model minimizes disputes between promoters and creditors and offers a practical solution for homebuyers. Instead of waiting years for legal closure, they get a tangible outcome—their homes.
Benefits of Reverse CIRP
- Homebuyer Protection: The primary benefit is that families waiting for their flats can finally receive possession.
- Value Preservation: The project gains back its market value through completion instead of being lost in liquidation.
- Creditor Confidence: Financial institutions recover more value from a completed project than from half-built assets.
- Promoter Accountability: The promoter participates only as a contributor, ensuring responsibility without regaining control unlawfully.
Additionally, Reverse CIRP builds trust in the legal and insolvency process by showing that the system can be responsive to the real-world needs of common citizens.
Challenges and Safeguards
Despite its promise, Reverse CIRP requires strict monitoring and transparency. Since promoters are involved again, there is always a risk of misuse of funds or delayed construction. Therefore, the resolution professional’s oversight is critical. The funds infused by promoters must be tracked separately, and regular progress reports should be submitted to the tribunal.
Another challenge is extending this framework uniformly across all real estate insolvency cases. At present, Reverse CIRP operates more as a judicial innovation rather than a codified legal mechanism under the IBC. Policymakers may need to formalize this process to provide clear guidelines for implementation, making it easier for all stakeholders to follow standard procedures.
The Road Ahead
The success of Reverse CIRP in select cases has already given a ray of hope to thousands of homebuyers. However, it needs stronger legislative backing and administrative clarity. If implemented well, this model can revive trust in the real estate market, boost investor confidence, and make insolvency resolution more humane.
Ultimately, the purpose of insolvency law is not merely to settle financial scores but to restore economic activity and protect the interests of all. Reverse CIRP embodies this spirit by giving stalled projects a new life and restoring the dreams of homebuyers who have waited too long for their homes to be completed.
Author Bio
