Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Auro Logistics Ltd Vs Assistant Director (SRO) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Auro Logistics Ltd Vs Assistant Director (SRO) (Madras High Court) An inquiry to be continued by Adjudicating Authority as per Notification dt. 27.9.2018 was in vogue and not under superseded notification Conclusion: The contention of assessee-company that the person issuing the show cause notice i.e., Special Director was “the” Adjudicating Authority and all proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice issued by him should be continued and concluded by the person issuing the show cause notice and no other was rejected. Show cause notice issued under Rule 4(1) of the Rules of 2000 before ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930